10. With apologies to my Indian friends, Indian food can give you the runs.
9. Timo has now replaced C-Mo as my clutch hitting Tiger. Quit it Timo!
8. Uh what? You went to the Zoo on Sunday? Dont worry, I wont tell anybody.
7. I may not like the Lions right now but props to Jon Kitna for coming back into the game with a mild concussion. You’re either really stupid or really brave.
6. MSU won ugly, Ill take it.
5. Dont get too excited UM fans, Notre Dame might be one of the worst Div 1A footbeall teams.
4. Can the Juice escape a prison term twice? Not likely, they got him on tape this time. I wonder if thats enough evidence. Oh, thats right, maybe it was planted.
3. In his memoirs, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan says the Iraq war was largely about oil. Thanks Alan, welcome to 2003. Mission accomplished!
2. Thanks a lot Boston. The one time I cheer for any of your teams and you fail miserably.
1. Winning an Emmy does not give you a platform to talk about your feelings on the Iraq war. You sounded like a bumbling idiot Sally Field. We are all now dumber for hearing you.






September 17, 2007
#1
The zoo is cool.
The End
September 17, 2007
#2
***QUOTE OF THE DAY***
So if you ever listen to 95.5 in the morning you know they do phone scams. This morning they called a lady posing as a jeweler calling to leave a message for her boyfriend. The message was about whether he wanted to go with the diamond or cubic zirconia. After 3 minutes of going crazy about how her boyfriend could even think about getting her a CZ she says:
“I done popped two babies out my body…I need a diamond!”
September 17, 2007
#3
OH NO HE DIDNT
September 17, 2007
#4
Hey Andy,
Nice prediction on the lions.
Your seat on the bandwagon is getting tougher to hold.
September 17, 2007
#5
pretty darn good prediction considering the game came down to a fg…
you know whats funny, the lions were about two inches away(insert joke about Mark here) from people saying “same old Lions” this morning..
but because longwells fg clanked off the uprights, all is good in Lions land…
nevermind the fact that they
a)cant run the ball
b)turn the ball over at will
c)were about one kitna sack away from having JT O’Sullivan as the starting qb for the rest of the year
so lets review, no running game, turnovers galore and no backup qb…
yep that definitely sounds like a playoff team to me
September 17, 2007
#6
Hey Andy,
Nice face!
OOOHHHHHH!
September 17, 2007
#7
OH NO HE DIDNT
September 17, 2007
#8
stupid johnny
September 17, 2007
#9
Andy,
The lions are an average team. . . not great . . but average. . . they have beat two teams that they should have beaten (something they have never done during the Millen era). The vikings have the best run defense in the league. . . . and a defense that creates turnovers. While Kitna was in there, the lions had ONE turnover. . They beat Oakland on the road (Oakland almost beat Denver in Denver) and the beat a Minn team that killed Atlanta last week. Are the lions a sure thing playoff team NO. . . but compared to what we have seen the last 6 years, this is the best during the Millen era.
Prediction for next week:
Phily 27
Lions 23
September 17, 2007
#10
and if we are going to compare them to the last couple of seasons, isnt that like saying,
“Oh, I just shat right now, I wonder what my shit looked like 6 years ago”
September 17, 2007
#11
Let’s review what Mark is saying and give him a little credit. The Lions have two wins already in the first two weeks of the season. That’s only happened once in the last 6 years, name the year?
Extended question of the day:
In what week did the Lions secure their second win in the last 6 years?
2001-Week 17 (2 Wins all season)
2002-Week 6 (3 total wins)
2003-Week 8 (5 wins)
2004-Week 2 (6 wins)
2005-Week 4 (5 wins)
2006-Week 8 (3 wins)
Isaac’s argument is valid, the Lions still suck and have proven they can lose a lot of games despite starting with 2 wins.
Winning is contagious. Football is a funny sport and momentum is worth a lot more than people think. Average teams can have a great season if they believe they can win. Who knows what will happen if they go into Philly next week and completely rob the Eagles.
As Mark said, there might not be room on the wagon for you if it happens.
(For the record, it won’t happen. They’re going to lose the next 3)
September 18, 2007
#12
Jumping back on the bandwagon at any time in the future would make you a fair-weather fan, wouldn’t it?
September 18, 2007
#13
With how bad the Eagles have played in the first two weeks, Im sure all Lions fans think they have a legitimate shot of winning next week…
however, much like the Spartans this week, can you really see the Eagles starting the season 0-3 and at home?
I sure as hell dont
I wont be a diehard fan again until some real changes are made…firing Matt Millen is a must…until then, Im an extremely casual fan…I wont plan my Sundays around them and sure as hell wont scream and throw things anymore
September 18, 2007
#14
But, you’re clearly off the “bandwagon” now.
Wouldn’t “jumping back aboard” next year or in two years label you a fairweather fan?
September 18, 2007
#15
Im not sure I agree with most people’s definition of “fairweather fan”….
Im sure the consensus is: loving, cheering for your team only when they are good makes you fairweather….
thats not really what im doing…
I will cheer them again, even if they are bad, as long as they get rid of matt millen
September 18, 2007
#16
But you won’t cheer for them if they’re good as long as Millen is still around?
September 18, 2007
#17
nope…casual fan
September 18, 2007
#18
But, if they’re doing well, I don’t understand you’re reasoning. Countering with “they will be back to being the same old Lions within a month” is not a reasonable answer.
September 18, 2007
#19
again,
good or bad, Im not going to be a diehard until Millen is gone
why is that hard to understand?
They wont go ANYWHERE or do ANYTHING while he is their GM…
September 18, 2007
#20
I think Isaac has been a Lions fan long enough and with enough enthusiasm not to have to face “bandwagon” or “fair-weather fan” questions, and to be frustrated with the team.
September 18, 2007
#21
I just don’t understand the logic behind hating Millen so much that you can’t cheer for your team anymore.
Jimmy Johnson could be hired as the Bills HC tomorrow and as long as they win and aren’t the thugs the 90’s Cowboys were, I’d be all about it.
September 18, 2007
#22
It seems like your reasoning in circular. . . . . . you will never be a diehard unless they fire millen because “They wont go ANYWHERE or do ANYTHING while he is their GM…” but even if they become good with Millen as the GM you will only be a casual fan . . . no diehard fan. . . . . But you will become a diehard fan again if they fire millen regardless if they win or not.
September 18, 2007
#23
Thank you, Mark.
September 18, 2007
#24
I don’t care one way or the other. I just don’t understand why you mean what you say.
I don’t care much for JP Losman, but if he’s going to be the Bills QB AND they play well, I’ll root like heck for him.
September 18, 2007
#25
Correct me if I’m wrong, Isaac, but you’re not convicned that the Lions will go anywhere with Millen at the helm. Even if they start 6-0, the wheels will eventually come off. Even if they go to the playoffs this year, you believe they will soon enough be a miserable team with Millen in charge.
Fair enough. I don’t think Isaac is rooting against them, he just isn’t convinced that they are worth a darn right now, notwithstanding their record. Let’s face it, they weren’t two impressive wins; true, they were wins, but they weren’t the type of performances that either instill you with confidence or make you think anything has changed.
Take the wins as the come, hope that thery win, but until they show us something, don’t spend another dime on the team. As a fan in this position, what else can you do?
September 18, 2007
#26
Let me try to be more concise here:
The Lions will never be a good team or organization while Matt Millen is the GM…
I stress good team because they MAY have a good season(which is what I was trying to say) here or there but overall, they will never be championship level caliber….they will never make the SuperBowl…
as a fan, you need hope, you need faith that your team is going to do something…
I do not have that hope or faith while he is the helm
Thus, I wll not be a diehard fan while he is GM because I would be cheering fruitlessly…so basically what I was doing the last 10+ years of my life…
it is a waste of time
September 18, 2007
#27
My perspective:
The Bills will not win the AFC East, the AFC or a Super Bowl anytime soon. The Patriots and Colts are too good right now. But, I still root like heck to climb the mountain. Why? Because I want them to do well. JP Losman is my Matt Millen. The team probably won’t go anywhere with him at QB, just like the Lions probably will not win a SB with MM as GM. However, both statements are far from guarantees.
The Bills have the longest playoff drought of any AFC team. But you won’t catch me not caring whether they win or lose until they’re mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. In which case, I will root against them because in the long run, it’s better that they get the higher draft picks (I don’t think you can argue much with that statement).
The Lions are smack-dab in the middle of a very weak NFC North and a weak NFC in general. The majority of the “powers” of the NFC, ie Chicago, New Orleans, Philadelphia have looked downright bad in the first two weeks. Of the “top teams” in the NFC, only Dallas has looked as good as advertised. Therefore, why rule the Lions out now? Yes, history is stacked against them, but history was stacked against the Tigers before last year too.
Yes you can’t stand Matt Millen, but you also can’t stand Pudge Rodriguez…yet you root for the Tigers.
This comment has turned into a “why I’m right and you’re wrong”, but that wasn’t my initial intention. My intention was to re-build the fire that made you break Pat’s couch and hurt five roommates’ ears.
These games still mean something. Even if the Lions lose their next three games, an NFC Wild Card spot can be had with an 8-8 record. Considering how weak the NFC North is, eight wins is not out of the question.
I’m not saying the Lions will make the playoffs or go 8-8 (as I predicted them to go 6-10). But, if Jon Kitna can stay upright like he did last year and their front four can maintain their play, why can’t they prove me wrong by winning two more games?
I’m not a Lions fan for selfish reasons. If my team can’t be good (the Bills), neither can your team.
But, as long as there is hope for this year and I don’t see how you an argue that there isn’t at least SOME hope, what’s wrong for rooting for them? All things considered, the Bills’ uphill climb is far steeper than the Lions, Matt Millen or no Matt Millen.
Fine, I’ll say it. I’m a bigger Bills fan than you are Lions fan. There.
Show some fire. The good times will seem so much better, if you do continue to “ride the lows” to get to the “highs”. The 15 years of Tigers futility made last year’s World Series that much more exciting.
Ok, I’m done.
September 18, 2007
#28
OH NO HE DIDNT
September 18, 2007
#29
tim,
i obviously cant guarantee that Millen wont take them to a SuperBowl…
but in my mind, I have no faith that he can
does that make sense?
My fire for the Lions is non-existent…
as for the Tigers comparison: If Randy Smith had stuck around, then I think a lot of Tigers fans would feel the same way…he was totally inept at his job…
Dave Dombrowski, at the very least has a track record of success as a GM….so you can always point to that and say, “that gives me faith”
very much the same for you, the Bills have made 4 superbowls in your lifetime and have been a fairly successful franchise….that gives you more hope and faith, doesnt it?
September 18, 2007
#30
The Bills having four AFC Championships has zero effect on their current team.
The only constant from that team and the current one is Ralph Wilson.
Having faith in a GM and having faith in its players/coaches are two different things. Matt Millen’s job for the year regarding this year’s team is pretty much done. Outside of having to sign/trade for someone if there is an injury, he has little to no effect on this year’s team anymore.
I totally understand not liking/not having respect for Millen, but that doesn’t mean that this year’s players and coaches can make a little noise.
September 18, 2007
#31
I don’t think that a GM has as much influence on a team’s performace as you do. . . a coach has a lot more impact than a GM in my humble opinion. Everyone praises Dave Dombrowski but everyone forget that he hired Trammell as a manager. I am not saying that it does not matter who the GM is. . . it’s just that I don’t think the impact is as big as you make it. . . now hiring Marty and Mooch were his mistakes and those were bad decision. . but Dombrowski hired Trammell. . . The Mooch hiring was hailed as the second coming of Jesus when it happened. . . Yes. . . some of first round picks have been busts, but we all forget Andre Ware, Reggie Rogers, Chuck Long, in my opinion, those picks were worst than all of Millen’s picks. His drafts have not all been busts. . . . . Roy Williams, Ernie Sims, Calvin Johnson, Kevin Jones, Shaun Rogers, Shaun Cody, Cory Redding, Boss Bailey, Jeff Backus, and Bullocks are all legit NFL players. . . can he improve. . . yes. . . but every GM makes mistakes at some point. . .
September 18, 2007
#32
Consider the last several and consecutive losing seasons, the last several coaches, the last several draft busts, and the last several personality issues/public affairs snaffoos; what is the common thread?
The coaches have changed, the players have changed, shoot, even the uniforms have changed, what has stayed the same (other than the dismal results)?
Ownership? Sure. But the same ownership produced teams with winning seasons/playoff births.
What else?
September 18, 2007
#33
you took the words out of my mouth Pat
mark, I cant believe you tried to defend matt millen…
September 18, 2007
#34
mark is a matt millen apologist…
this is worse than al being a joey apologist
September 18, 2007
#35
I am not a millen apologist. . . I just don’t agree with the point that the GM is the most important guy in a football team. . . is millen the best GM, NO. . . but I think at this point he is adequate
September 18, 2007
#36
If the point of andy is that he wants a good team and not just a good season. . . then Andy should not become a lions fan again until the Ford family sells the team. . . the Ownership has produced ONE playoff win in 50 YEARS!!!!!! They have never made it to the SB. If that is the criteria, Andy will become a lions fan in . . . . . how does NEVER sound. . .
September 19, 2007
#37
mark, did you call millen adequate?
no, adequate is .500 or slightly below…
he is I believe 26-72…
can you imagine if you were that bad at your job? whats the equivalent?
taking a dump on your bosses desk?
as far as Ford, Ive given up on them selling the team…I see no scenario where that will happen so therefore, Ive given up on that idea…
but Millen, he is expendable as past GMs have…
September 19, 2007
#38
At this point he is adequate . . . his drafts for the past two years have been better (almost all draft picks are still in the league and the top 4-5 picks are still with the Lions). . . he is not signing guys for above market salaries (Az Hakim). I agree with you that he was not very good when he started, but what do you expect when you hire a guy that has NO experience as a GM. I blame that on the Ford’s. The Ford’s will never fire Millen. . . lest we forget that they did not fire Russ Thomas. . .so if you want to be a lions fan you must accept that two things will stay the same way for many more years. . . the Ford family and Millen. . . they do not fire GM’s that quickly
September 19, 2007
#39
Mark’s last post was pretty on the money.
September 19, 2007
#40
I’m not sure it is . . .
If that’s the case, and that’s the defense to the Lions’ pathetic on-field performance under Millen’s tenure, I guess I’m confused what the role of General Manager of a professional football team should be. It isn’t really a defense for Millen to say, “I’m doing the best I can, I’m not qualified for this job.” That’s basically conceding he shouldn’t have the job he has (which is the point Isaac is making). Looking at draft picks and free agents signed: ok, a few (maybe many, shoot, maybe all) of the guys Millen has selected have panned out to be decent pros with respectable careers, but he obviously has not assembled a team that is able to compete in the NFL. Same can be said for the free agents he has signed: sure, he may have signed good players at good prices, but what effect have those signings had on the ultimate product? They still aren’t winning games.
If you’re telling me that the role of the GM is to balance a budget like he’s running a business and draft guys that can make it in the NFL (which players picked the first day should), each with ZERO regard for whether that will help the on-field performance of the team (i.e. “winning games”), then sure, maybe Millen has done a better job than he’s getting credit for. BUT, if part of the GM’s job involves the on-field success of the team, different story.
Who’s job is it to win?
The players? As you’ve said, the players are good players. Who assembles them? (management).
The coaches? They haven’t been doing their job, but who hires them? (management)
If it’s not the players’ fault, and it’s not management’s fault, whose fault is it?
September 19, 2007
#41
I never have said and never will say that, up until this year going forward (maybe), Matt Millen has done a good job building a winning football team.
However, it was not his fault that he was handed a position where he was far unqualified for at the time he was hired. It was also not his fault that the Lions had absolute bupkis for talent when he was hired. Yes, he has certainly had a hand in the Lions dismal record since his hiring, but there are many other factors that go into their abysmal existence.
As Mark said, once the Lions ownership likes a member of their administration, they become fixated on them. What has Tom Lewand done to deserve to a front office position involving player personnel going on 12 years? Why the shoot does Bill Ford, Jr. still have any hand in the football decisions? The only answer to both of those questions is because Bill Ford, Sr. is the Lions owner.
For sure the Marty Thingamajig hiring turned out poorly. He falls into the classic case of a guy who makes a much better coordinator than a head coach. But, even so, he was a stepping stone for Millen’s guy anyway – Steve Mariucci. Now, raise your hand if you TOTALLY disagreed with the Mariucci hiring. Be honest. Yes, you could say he was overrated, but at the time, there was no more qualified, experience head coaching candidate out there. We all know how that tenure failed, but hindsight is 20/20. I don’t know if I would believe anyone on this board if they say they thought it was a terrible hiring when it happened. So, how much can you really fault Millen for that? Yes, he did not provide Mooch with the necessary players to go out and win, but at the same time, he was still in over his head as far as his responsibilities for building a winning football team…again, not really his fault. Sidenote concerning the Mornhinweg/Mooch era: Joey Harrington was not Millen’s choice for that draft pick. Quentin Jammer was. Quentin Jammer starts for a team who lost in the AFC Championship last year. Joey’s lack of development was also a major hurdle/barrier from the Lions having recent success…much like JP Losman in Buffalo right now.
Now, we come to the Rod Verysmelly era. Last year was a bad one. Team dissention left and right. Marinelli’s main focus last year was to fill his team with guys that shared his attitude. He weeded out losers like Dre Bly. He made Jon Kitna, who is one tough/stupid son of a gun, his QB. He knew the Lions weren’t going to go 10-6 last year; but, his goal was simple: prove you belong and you will belong.
Now, we fast forward to this year. Millen has a head coach who, whether you like him or not, you have to like his attitude. He has started to put people in the right places (to show that after all this time, he might actually be catching on how to build a team). And, the NFC couldn’t be weaker.
The job of winning is on EVERYONE that has a hand in each individual football game. The GM, the Player Personnel Director, the head coach, the assistant coaches, the quarterback, the holder on the field goals, the team managers, trainers, etc. It’s Millen’s job to put the right people in the right places to succeed.
Judging by what I said earlier about Tom Lewand and Bill Jr. still having hands in the organization, something tells me that they would have been involved no matter who was the Lions GM – Bill Walsh, Bill Polian, you name it. Granted, Polian and Walsh are far far more accomplished than Millen, but again, it wasn’t Millen’s fault that he was hired. It isn’t Millen’s fault that Bill Sr. grossly overpaid him on his contract extension.
Maybe, just maybe, Millen has started the Lions on the track to succeeding. Maybe he hasn’t, but they’re 2-0 and face an 0-2 Philly team that has looked like Michigan in its first two games. 3-0 isn’t too farfetched. Some “experts” are actually picking it.
Now, if you want to say this post was an apology for Millen’s disgusting first six years, you’re wrong. He should have been fired after four years, but he wasn’t. On the other hand, maybe he has started to learn how to run a decent football team. Maybe he hasn’t, but maybe he has.
My question to you: why is Matt Millen your enemy? The Lions were awful far before Matt Millen. I think Mark brought this up earlier. For Lions fans, the enemy shouldn’t be Matt Millen; it should be the guy who has let this losing go on for decades; the guy who has let guys like Lewand and Bill Jr. run the front office for over a decade over misery; the same guy that didn’t fire Millen after four years and gave him a ridiculous extension despite his horrid record; shoot, the guy that lets Millen live in Pennsylvania. Don’t say you wouldn’t work from home on a somewhat regular basis if your boss let you. Your enemy shouldn’t be Matt Millen, it should be Bill Ford, Sr.
With ALL of that said, the Lions are 2-0, why not enjoy the ride while it lasts?
By the way, for not giving two Rips (Haaaaaaamilton’s) about the Lions, I have written way too much about them in the last three days.
September 19, 2007
#42
“It’s Millen’s job to put the right people in the right places to succeed.”
I think that sums it up. They have had good players (see all those listed); they have had coaches that have had storied success (see, specifically, Mariucci). They just haven’t seemed to have people in the right places in order to succeed.
Millen is supposed to be the “football guy.” He played football, commented on football on tv, then took over this job. He may have businesses (I don’t know), but he came in billed as a grtty, hard-nosed “football guy,” in charge of making “football decisions.”
As for Lewand, although he may pretend to be more than he is, he is ultimately a “business guy.” He negotiates contracts, does land deals (he was integral for the Ford Field purchase, construction and move), and makes other “business decisions” (primarily). Does he affect wins and losses? Sure, probably. But regardless of what kind of football team the Lions are, they remain a pretty good business. As long as they are making money (regardless of losses), Ford’s not selling (and Lewand’s probably sticking around too).
Win more games, make more money. Obviously. But shouldn’t we look at the “football guy” when we have issues with the on-the-field product?
September 19, 2007
#43
There are countless football guys that would make bad GMs if they were given that much responsibility tomorrow. Matt Millen is a football guy yes, but so is Tom Lewand (according to the Lions). He oversees their player development and football administration. Yes, he works on the business side of things, but he oversees football things too.
My main argument from before: Yes, it’s Millen’s job to put the right people in the right spots…BUT, it’s Bill Sr.’s job to put the right man in the right spot who is responsible for putting the right people in the right spots, ie you can blame Millen, yes, but your ultimate blame should be on the owner. He’s the head guy. Yes, it’s his team and he can do what he wants, but Millen, Lewand and Bill Jr. can also run their posts like they want…or they would be long gone.
As far as the Lions being a good business. 99% of NFL teams are good business. Most talented businessmen who also happen to be knowledgable footballmen could run an NFL team. The NFL is a sport unlike any other. Fans only get eight chances to come watch their team play. Of course tickets will sell. However, on the same token, why was that first game not televised? Not enough tickets were sold.
Sure the Lions may be a crappy organization and you won’t get that argument from me, but it starts from the very top. Bill Sr. knows Millen’s record, he knows how many playoff games Tom Lewand and Bill Jr. have had a hand in. Lewand and Bill Jr. should have had their hands removed from the football aspect a long time ago. Millen should have been let go years ago. But, it isn’t any of their faults that they still hold the jobs they do today.
September 19, 2007
#44
I think, then, ultimately, we are arguing the same point: Millen should not have the job he has.
Yes, the top guy is the guy to blame, but Ford isn’t going to sell the team. If 99% of NFL teams are good businesses, why would you let that go? That’s why I turn off sports tlak when they say: Ford’s gotta go. Where’s he gonna go?
Ford needs to make changes to make for a better team. You’re right, the Lions could not be off to a better start. So maybe the changes have been made. History suggests the change that needs to be made is firing Millen (and probably others). But Millen is at the focal point, justifiably so. All you can do to “protest” Ford is not give him money.
September 19, 2007
#45
And my other main point was that although Millen was a “football guy” coming in, it takes more than that to be able to build a team.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I am pretty sure he had ZERO front office experience. But…maybe, just maybe, after six years of futility, he has learned from his mistakes.
September 19, 2007
#46
In the past 18 years the Lions have had two GM’s Chuck Schmidt and Millen. Schmidt was a #’s guy with NO experience with football matters (he was the CFO of the Lions) and Millen who had NO experience in management. Prior to that they had Russ Thomas as the GM from 67 to 89. May he rest in peace but Russ Thomas was the worst executive in the history of professional sports yet he kept his job for 22 years. Schmidt was “fired” after 11 years as GM. If not for Barry Sanders, Schmidt would have a worse record than Millen as GM. Schmidt was given a team that had Barry Sanders Chris Spielman, Lomas Brown, Kevin Glover, Bennie Blades, Ray Crockett, Jerry Ball, Mike Cofer, and George Jamison. All of these players were in their first 1-5 years and were entering into the prime of their careers. These players were all drafted by Jerry Vainisi (the former bears GM who was the director of player personnel for the Lions for 3-4 years) the guy who should have been made GM instead of Schmidt. Millen was given a team that was very old and had no young talent. The only player still on the team from the days before Millen is Jason Hanson. Yes Millen made mistakes with both drafts, signing free agents, and hiring Marty, but I think he has learned from his mistakes. Time will tell if he can build a winning team, but we must look at what he had when he started (No RB, Charlie Batch as QB, NO O-line, and a very old Herman Moore
September 20, 2007
#47
One thing in this whole discussion that I am having a hard time grasping is how I have similar views with a guy who sat on my head.
September 20, 2007
#48
As opposed to agreeing with the guy that sat on your face?
Oooh burn