Guyism

Putting "Dive In" on teen girl's panties may not be a great idea

As an avid watcher of pubescent girls’ underwear, this story troubled me. Disney released a pair of underwear for young girls in the UK with the phrase “Dive In” on the front of them.

Disney has sparked outrage by producing High School Musical pants for young girls with the suggestive words ‘Dive In’ emblazoned across them.

The underwear, part of the hugely successful movie’s range of merchandise, has also been criticised by the NSPCC.

The packs of knickers are on sale in Asda, where Sue Ralph unwittingly bought some for her seven-year-old granddaughter in the Broadstairs, Kent, store.

Mrs Ralph added: ”I think it is inappropriate because you just never know who could be out and about and see that and just think it was a bit too enticing for a young child to be wearing.”

Um, I don’t know that I’d call it enticing. I’m pretty susceptible to ads (you should have seen all the violent homicides I committed for Klondike bars) but listening to what a pair of girls’ panties tells me to do is a bit far fetched. It’s like being a pedophilic Son of Sam.

I seriously doubt the kids are seeing the reference as one about hopping into a warm glass of cooch though. It’s really only parents that see this, make a big deal out of it, spread it to the media, and then continue to make the kids see themselves in a sexualized way. So while they’re trying to keep the kids safe, all they’re doing is further pressing the issue and exposing more kids to how “sexual” they can be in certain circumstances. It’s so easy to keep passing the buck to media and society when some of the problems lie within.

Taylor Momsen is of course the exception. That right thurr is womanly.

other cool stuff from guyism's partners
  • Misanthrope
    August 14, 2008
    #1

    If someone is in a position to read your 13-year-old daughter’s panties, hasn’t the failure already happened? In fact, I would suspect that the front of a pubescent girl’s panties is the very worst place to put any sort of advertisement, because most guys don’t read much once a girls pants come off. When Dreamworks releases a Shrek t-shirt that says “Donkey-punch” on the back, maybe I’ll be concerned. Then again, I’ll probably be too busy to really worry about it.

  • Chris
    August 14, 2008
    #2

    Ha, I laughed at the Donkey-punch line…sounds like you missed the boat working in some sort of t-shirt slogan job, my friend.

  • Lexie
    April 24, 2009
    #3

    Where do you go with this one? I think Disney did not think about this one before giving the green light. On the other hand what does it mean to a 7 year old? Regardless let it go, don’t let it happen again as the local cops used to say to me when they caught me drinking and driving. Lets follow the rule: No “cute” sayings on the front of any panties, after all what is the point of putting anything on the front of panties regardless of her age? 9 or 19 or 29? Why do you want to express some sentiment on a pair of panties? Among the many things I just don’t get!

Leave a Reply:




tip your editors at editorsATguyismDOTcom
Guyism Picks: Today's Best Links
123455
Guyism's Gal-leries
 Latest Posts on Guyism
Latest Comments
 Polls

Who's the most overrated hot female celeb of the moment?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...