If you’ve been to a strip club recently, you’ll know that there’s definitely a certain art to what strippers do. You think it’s easy to grind a man into submission when he looks like a real-life version of Mario minus mushroom powers or heroism? But a NY tax appeals court ruled that stripping is not an art. Boo.
An Albany tax appeals board was considering giving sales tax-exempt status to the local “Nite Moves” strip club under the postulate that stripping and, in particular pole-dancing, is an art.
A lower court judge, presumably after several persuasive arguments from local exotic dance talents, ruled that strippers were taking part in “dramatic or musical arts” and, as a result, qualified for tax-free status.
But the tax appeal board overruled the judge said that the performances couldn’t be considered in the same bracket as “things such as ballet performance.” Presumably because men aren’t bored to tears to by strip club performances.
There are more parallels with strippers and ballerinas than these tax appeal board folks would be willing to admit. Most of the girls are Russian and probably here illegally. They’re very flexible. They wear garish clothes. If more men came to ballet performances with opened shirts and cheap cologne, I don’t think you’d be able to tell the difference.
Stripping Not Art, Does Not Qualify For Tax-Free Status [MyFoxDC]









The hottest photos ever taken of SuperWAG/swimsuit model Irina Shayk
Natalie from Florida State likes bubble baths and bikinis
LINSANITY! America’s first Asian stripper wearing a Jeremy Lin jersey
The Washington Capitals' Red Rockers might be the hottest ice girls in the NHL
Sexy brunette Harley White really needs someone to buy her a bra [NSFWish]
5 reasons you should never brag on the Internet
The sexiest sports hottie from each state in America
Kate Upton and the 2012 SI Swimsuit Issue models are still at it
92 pics of sexy amateurs, because it's Wednesday [NSFWish]
Battle of the Brunette Models: Jessica vs. Leigh vs. Emily