So we all saw the ads for Jennifer Love Hewitt’s new show The Client List with the serious boobage? Lifetime is trying to take that back. Hewitt rocked our world with the sexy ad campaign for The Client List earlier this year, ]]>

So we all saw the ads for Jennifer Love Hewitt’s new show The Client List with the serious boobage? Lifetime is trying to take that back. Hewitt rocked our world with the sexy ad campaign for The Client List earlier this year, and the images have done more for her new show than all the daytime TV appearances in the world. That’s why I’m shocked that, in the latest wave of print ads, Lifetime has drastically reduced the size and exposure of Love’s luscious lady lumps.

You can see for yourself in the image above. On the left is the original image that we all love, and on the right is the newly-edited version where J-Love’s cup size has been withered away like American exceptionalism. The saddest thing is that the actress actually had no idea that Lifetime was making the change, only finding out when a friend emailed her a photograph, according to the New York Daily News. A crime against humanity has been perpetrated here, people. Let those funbags free. Nobody’s going to watch this damn show if they’re locked up.

A woman’s knees are the window to the soul. Wait, is that not the expression? Huh. Well then. Anyway, women’s store Forever 21 is Photoshopping out women’s kneecaps, making some sort of monster in their product listings.

Maybe having legs like a carrot are the hot ]]>

A woman’s knees are the window to the soul. Wait, is that not the expression? Huh. Well then. Anyway, women’s store Forever 21 is Photoshopping out women’s kneecaps, making some sort of monster in their product listings.

Maybe having legs like a carrot are the hot trend this spring? Or Forever 21 models have evolved beyond the need to bend their legs? Probably the latter. Models..always advancing society.

You can see more strange kneecap-less sexy ladies at Buzzfeed.

Forever 21 Hates Women’s Kneecaps [Buzzfeed]

Ever bought any Adobe products? If not, they’re really freaking expensive. Like, Photoshop is $699. Dreamweaver’s the cheapest out of the lot, and it’s $399.

Which is why it’s nice to see that Adobe’s introduced renting options for their products — consumers can either ]]>

Ever bought any Adobe products? If not, they’re really freaking expensive. Like, Photoshop is $699. Dreamweaver’s the cheapest out of the lot, and it’s $399.

Which is why it’s nice to see that Adobe’s introduced renting options for their products — consumers can either rent monthly or yearly depending on their needs

It seems crazy to consider a rental of Photoshop, but 700 bones ain’t nothing to sneeze at. Of course, it’s $35 per month for a yearly rental, which seems like a bit much, if only because after 12 months, that’s $420 towards the full product.

Without the full yearly rental, Photoshop will run you $49 a month (one month rental, or month-to-month, depending, obviously) and that’s not so horrible.

After all, there are tons of small businesses that have graphic needs which they outsource for substantially more than that. If you have someone in-house who knows what they’re doing in terms of graphic design, you can spend $50, download the software, let them fire out whatever you need over the course of a month and save hundreds of dollars.

Or, perhaps, you’re looking to design a website but don’t want to pay someone $1,000 to do it. $29 for a month of Dreamweaver seems like a pretty good price, if you ask me.

And, of course, this is a pretty stupendous option for a freelancer. If you’re the one who lands the graphic/website design that pays several hundred bucks, you can substantially cut down on your costs and, obviously, make a bigger profit than you would if you needed to purchase the entire

Here’s a handy breakdown of the pricing guide, courtesy of Download Squad:

Rent Adobe Products – [Adobe]
You can now rent Adobe Photoshop for $29 a month – [Download Squad]

We’ve been long time fans of Katy Perry on this site. With good reason…her music is catchy (despite how shameful it may be for us to put that in writing), she seems kind of interesting, and she’s smoking hot. But apparently, Rolling Stone disagrees since they Photoshopped her ]]>

We’ve been long time fans of Katy Perry on this site. With good reason…her music is catchy (despite how shameful it may be for us to put that in writing), she seems kind of interesting, and she’s smoking hot. But apparently, Rolling Stone disagrees since they Photoshopped her up real good on their newest issue’s cover.

Naturally, a lot of the women out there are up in arms. Katy Perry’s naturally pretty hot. And then she’s made up by Rolling Stone’s photography crew, anyway. So why the excessive ‘shoppage?

Tumblr…er lourtneycove — the originator of the .gif above — says:

This is terrible. She’s beautiful to begin with. Why does her skin have to be silky smooth? Her boobs pushed up? They even took off her sock in the ‘enhanced’ one. Her stomach. Her fingers. Her moles are removed from her neck. Lines removed from her underarm. Is it so bad not to be perfect?

I see absolutely nothing wrong with the before picture. She’s absolutely beautiful. Why does the media see fit to change that? No wonder why society is messed up.

I tend to agree with the above sentiment. That said, they did make her much brighter and foxier in the Photoshopped version. If you compare the “after” to the “before”, it’s sort of like looking at someone who looked at the Ark of the Covenant, but just really briefly. And then put a sock on her right foot for no reason.

So…did she need the Photoshop treatment?

This Is Shopped of the Day [The Daily What]
Lourtney Cove [Tumblr]

The Justin Biebosphere was buzzing over the cover of a Brazilian magazine that made the teenage pop star look like he was heavily photoshopped. The magazine is now responding to those claims in a ridiculously hilarious statement about Bieber’s “natural beauty.”

The pop star looks ]]>

The Justin Biebosphere was buzzing over the cover of a Brazilian magazine that made the teenage pop star look like he was heavily photoshopped. The magazine is now responding to those claims in a ridiculously hilarious statement about Bieber’s “natural beauty.”

The pop star looks picture perfect on the November issue’s cover, with a dewy complexion, rosy cheeks, pink pout and darkly rimmed eyes.

Todateen Star addressed the Photoshop accusations in a denial to the Huffington Post, which translated it from Portuguese.

“We could not help noticing your comments and tweets from the picture of Justin on the [magazine's] cover,” the statement read. “We would like to say that there was no change made in the area of the singer’s eyes.”

“We also want to say that all of us find Justin very naturally beautiful,” the statement added. “We’d never think it necessary to alter pictures of him. Natural beauty says it all, right?”

That’s not Photoshopped?! Todateen Star mag denies alteration of Justin Bieber’s cover photo [NY Daily News]

Photoshopping photos happens a lot in different forms of media. But when it happens so poorly as a part of showing some type of diversity in Toronto, well, it’s just ridiculous looking.

Original version is on the left. Just in case you’re blind or incapable of ]]>

Photoshopping photos happens a lot in different forms of media. But when it happens so poorly as a part of showing some type of diversity in Toronto, well, it’s just ridiculous looking.

Original version is on the left. Just in case you’re blind or incapable of seeing race

The smiling, ethnically diverse family featured on the cover of Toronto’s latest edition of its summer Fun Guide was digitally altered to make the photo more “inclusive,” which city officials say is in keeping with a policy to reflect diversity.

A spokesman for the department that publishes the guide listing recreation activities confirmed the publication was doctored to insert the face of a different father.

“He superimposed the African-Canadian person onto the family cluster in the original photo. It was two photographs and one head was superimposed over the original family photo,” said John Gosgnach, communications director for the social development division.

“The goal was to depict the diversity of Toronto and its residents.”

I’d say that goal has been successfully achieved. Assuming that Toronto wanted to showcase its large contingency of black guys with oversized heads creepily staring at Latina women. In which case, there’s really no disputing their presence. I am disheartened at how that contingency has opted to leave the Bronx, however.

[via, as seen on]

]]> http://guyism.com/uncategorized/toronto-needs-more-black-people.html/feed 2 Toronto needs more black people photo